Causal Conversations: A Test of Faith

Causual-conversationsWords are an essential measuring stick of the Christian faith. The words we employ when talking with our next-door neighbor, when sharing with our family, and when commenting on social media reveal the true status of our hearts. In 1 Samuel 16:18, the soon-to-be King David was selected to serve as Saul’s therapeutic counselor because he was both a talented musician and a man of God. We know this because verses 7 and 13 of this chapter reveal that God has given David the throne because the shepherd loves the Lord with his whole heart. But Saul and his bureaucratic staff were not aware that God had chosen David. And when they become aware of his anointing, they attempt to kill him. They discerned David’s godliness another way.

The text says David is “prudent in speech.” Saul’s entourage knew David was godly because they had heard the shepherd boy speak. They were not enamored with David because he was professional, witty, or romantic in choice of words. Rather the term “prudent in speech” means David was hyper wise. According to the Proverbs, those who are prudent in speech do not speak quickly, they do not respond to insults, and they do not vent. David retrains his lips from hurtful words, commends knowledge, and loves talking about the Lord (Prov. 10:19; 12:16,23; 14:15; 15:2; 29:20). David’s speech reveals he was a man of God. The secular world took notice of a lowly shepherd boy because he used words wisely as he bounced about the fields with his sheep. Out of the heart the mouth speaks.

What will world notice about us when they hear our words? Will our neighbors, family members, and employers look to us for help in times of trouble because they know our words are thoughtful, uplifting, and encouraging? Or will they shy away from us because we gossip, complain, and vent like the worldly people around us? What’s in your heart? What do you love? What do your words reveal about you?

Don’t Trust Your Intuition: The Art of Picking Biblical Leaders

intuitionChristians are really bad at picking spiritual leaders. The inability of Christian’s to find the right guys and gals to lead their church is nothing new.

When Samuel goes to Bethlehem to find a godly king to replace king Saul, Samuel chooses the wrong guy. He is prepared to cover Eliab in oil, thinking, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is before him (1 Sam 16:7).” If Samuel is left to his own judgement, the world would have never gotten king David.

God intervenes and tells Samuel quote, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” God wants the insignificant son, David, who is hanging-out with the sheep instead of chilling with the high society types. God favors those who love the Lord with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength and their neighbor as themselves.

Sadly, the evangelical church struggles to find and appoint such people to leadership. We tend to look on the outward appearance and stature of those around us. We gravitate towards those with big personalities. We call men to pastor because they have the voice of Billy Graham and can make us laugh. We appoint men to serve as elders because they are relational and can carry on a good conversation with just about anyone. And, we ask the lady to head up our women’s group because she is charming and just has a way with words. If someone looks the part of a pastor, elder, deacon, or lady’s Bible teacher, we are often quick to anoint them as such. After all, he or she is so attractive and nice. Surely, we cannot do better?

We can; we must. Outward giftings do not make a person a spiritual leader. Good looks and charisma also do not disqualify someone from ministry. David was one gifted, handsome, and stately dude (1 Sam. 16:12,18). But God is not ultimately impressed with a man’s presence in the pulpit. He is impressed with what the man does in his living room when the wife and kids are at the store.  Similarly, God is not ultimately impressed with a woman’s ability to tweet pithy statements that cause us to chuckle. God is impressed with the thoughts that flow through her head after her husband and kids have gone to sleep. The great pastor D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones noted,

What a man does with his own solitude is what ultimately counts. The things that are within, which we hide from the outside world because we are ashamed of them, these proclaim finally what we really are.

God sees men and women when they stow away from the world. He knows who we really are. He values the righteous, men and women of character.

Sadly, we lack insights into the souls of our future leaders. But like Samuel we have access to the thoughts of God which will guide us to right people. In Titus 1:6-9, God describes what he is looking for in a leader. Those who aspire to be a pastor, an elder, or a teacher should be:

Above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, 8 but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. 9 He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.

Notice Paul says nothing about their ability to make people laugh, their skills in conversation, or their capacity to charm the crowd. God is not concerned about personality, looks, and national platforms. He is concerned about character. When we judge men and women to see whether or not they are spiritual leaders, we should hold them to the above biblical standard. We should exam the potential leader’s life to see if he is prone to anger, greed or other vices. We should ask the potential leader and if applicable his spouse hard questions that will reveal his heart. Christians should never assume that good looks equal good character. Rather, Christians who love God and seek to promote holiness should probe, test, and question the person sitting in the interview chair. And then, they should pray asking God to give them divine insights into what they just saw and heard. Discerning whether or not a potential leader is a saint or a fool is hard work.

Today, many of our churches are dying because they shun that hard work, choosing leaders like Samuel chose Eliab. The churches hire men because they sound like Adrian Rogers and install women women because they look like Lottie Moon. Yet, they never stop to ponder whether or not those new leaders possess the character of Adrian Rogers and Lottie Moon.

Christians frequently do not ask the hard questions because they we believe that they have the skills of perception or that special gifting of intuition needed to discern good and bad character.

But they do not. And you do not. We are all sinners. And our perceptions and intuitions are easily deceived because they are clouded by sin. Consequently, we are prone to settle for looks and charisma that fall far short of the Biblical definition of character. Samuel could not discern the will of God by relying on his flesh. Can we do better? I think not. Do not trust your intuition. Trust the Bible.

Do you know how to find a good leader, a person of character?

King Saul: The Progressive, Liberal Faith of the OT

liberalThe core of liberal Christianity is not the brain child of twentieth and twenty-first century theologians. People who wore tunics and rode in chariots were writing off the Bible as being too harsh, too outdated, and too confining long before ascot adorned professors arrived on the scene. In fact, Adam and Eve wrestled with this very question of the whether or not God really said what he meant. “Did God really say, not to eat the fruit?

In 1 Samuel 15, we come across another precursor of liberal Christianity. God commands Saul to annihilate the Amalekites because they had abused the nation of Israel and other people groups. By obeying God’s command, Saul would fulfill a divine prophecy. In Exodus 17:14-16, God had declared, “I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.”  If Saul fails to destroy Amalek, he would violate the Word of God just a a child violates the Word of God by stealing. God said, “You shall not steal.” 

Sadly, Saul fails to obey God’s command. The text reports that

Saul and the people spared Agag and the best of the sheep and of the oxen and of that fattened calves and the lambs, and all that was good and would not utterly destroy them. All that was despised and worthless they devoted to destruction (1 Sam. 15:3).

Saul and his army profited from those they were sent to execute. The Jews under Saul were like a prisons guard stealing a convicts Air-Jordan’s and Apple watch as he received a lethal injection.

Saul and the people seemingly disobey God’s Word for personal profit. Though their actions would cause most of us to gag, we can still relate to the two heart desires driving Saul: a desire to be relevant and a desire to be liked. The king refuses to kill Agag because Kings in the ancient world considered the killing of other kings bad Karama. The cultural thing to do was to kill the armies and the people but to spare the king. And so, Saul spares King Agag even though he had spent his reign terrorizing and murdering women and children (1 Sam. 15:23).  As the great theologian John Calvin noted:

“Here then was Saul’s sin; He wished to be more merciful than God.”

Saul looked at his culture and concluded that God’s commands were too harsh and so he lessened them.

Postmodern, progressive Christians often make the same argument. They deem the prohibitions against sex outside of marriage, homosexuality, and divorce to be too harsh. The liberals know that Bible-deniers are some of the most powerful and popular people in their community. If they cling to the Bible, they will offend the powerful and lose social status.

To maintain their relationship to the divine, progressive souls must declare that God has changed his view of sexuality declaring yesterday’s evil to be today’s holiness. As Saul before them, liberal Christians extend the mercy of God to keep pace with the cultural elites.

Second, Saul disobeys God because he feared the common people. He wants to please the people and so he fails to follow God’s Word to the letter. The people desire nice stuff, so Saul allows his troops to profit from the execution of Amalekites. He feared men more than he feared God.

The fear of man continues to plague modern men and women of faith. No one wants to be hated, picked last for kick-ball, or discover that they are in the minority on any substantive issue. We feel a lot more confident when we are part of the 90% of America as oppose to 10%. Yet those who follow the Word of God are promised perpetual minority status. Jesus said, “because you are not of this world…the world hates you (John 15:19).”

But, we still love to be loved, creating a problem.

The majority culture that has the greatest reservoirs of human love hates the words of God. Before we can access the culture’s love, we have to repudiate the Bible’s teaching on sin, homosexuality, and the exclusivity of Christ. If we don’t walk back God’s commands, the culture threatens to empty our churches. And sadly, we often listen to our culture, believing the ends will justify the means. We think God will understand that we have to abandon parts of the Bible to reach and influence more people with the Bible. Popularity demands we fear men and women instead of the Scriptures. And so, we follow after Saul and our culture.

Unfortunately for Saul and for liberal Christians, God does not tolerate changes to his commands. God never stutters when he speaks. God is not a college student who needs the opportunity to rewrite his term paper.

The prophet Samuel reports, “The Glory of Israel will not lie or have regret, for he is not a man, that he should have regret (1 Sam. 15:29).”

God does not change. God never outlaws sexual sin and then regrets his harsh words a few millennia later because he saw how “in-love” two unmarried coeds were.

Those who change the law of God, have not helped God and have not stumbled unto deep religious truth. They have defied God and deserve death. Samuel point blank tells us that ‘Rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry.” Those who change the Bible by expanding upon God’s mercy to appease cultural elites or by whipping away truths to appease the masses do not worship the God of the Bible. They worship a false God of their own imagination.

J. Gresham Machen correctly notes that the modern, liberal, progressive Christianity that dominates much of the media, “is fundamentally hostile to the Christian faith.” He goes on to say,

Liberalism is totally different from the Christianity, for the foundation is different. Christianity is founded upon the Bible. It bases upon the Bible both its thinking and life. Liberalism on the other hand is founded upon the shifting emotions of sinful men.

The religion of Saul and of liberalism is a false religion. God hates such half-heart, evolving, man-centered faith because it is not true faith. Samuel tells Saul, “Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected you from being king.” Regardless of their titles and their church affiliations, those who disobey the Word of the Lord receive God’s judgment.

According to liberal theologians, children who have grown up talking to Suri will only stay with Jesus if we make his teachings more culturally aware and relevant. King Saul made this same argument long before radios, cars, and airplanes dotted the earth. God was not impressed then and he is not impressed now.

The Bible has never been modern enough for even the most rudimentary of people. But it has always been true. Will you believe it?