For the Love of Neighbor Oppose VA Amendments 1 & 2

Christians should unashamedly join forces to defeat Amendments 1 and 2 to the Virginia Constitution. Both proposed amendments violate God’s clear commands and thereby threaten to harm Virginians. Amendment 1 threatens harm to children (both pre-born and born) and women by expanding access to abortion.  Amendment 2 threatens to harm Virginia’s families and churches through redefining marriage. One undermines the sanctity of life and the other the sanctity of marriage. Both should be opposed this November.

Gospel and Politics?

Pastors Of Virginia Logo U76DTV01IRtkFEje

Admittedly, the Christian’s foremost mission remains the proclamation of the gospel. But this mission does not negate the Christian’s calling to be the salt of the earth (Matt. 5:13). Jesus commissioned his followers to preach and to preserve their culture from the rot of sin. To quote the prominent 20th century British Theologian John Stott, “We who are Christians should be more courageous, more out spoken in condemning evil.”

Consequently, the Christian should advocate for good laws and oppose unjust laws. As Jeremiah 29:7 notes, God’s people should “seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you.”

When a constitutional amendment promises to institutionalize laws that violate the clear commands of Scripture and that will thereby harm his neighbors, the Christian has an obligation to step into the public square and advocate for justice. Stott notes, “However small our part my be, we cannot opt out of seeking to create better social structures, which guarantee justice in legislation.” In other words, love demands that Virginia’s Christians raise the flag of biblical warning and advocate for the defeat Amendments 1 and 2 to the Virginia Constitution.

Oppose Amendment 1

Christians should oppose Amendment 1 because it threatens to harm children (both pre-born and born) and women.

The amendment eliminates all restrictions on abortion, allowing women to murder their children through the third trimester if a physician has determined that the child’s death is needed “to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.” If a woman feels that her baby will cause her stress or anxiety or prove disadvantageous to her life in any way however small, she can have an abortion up to the moment of birth. And if the child somehow survives the process of being pulled apart and crushed, doctors do not have to care for the child and can let it die. Amendment 1 threatens harm to future generations of pre-born Virginians and should be opposed.

Amendment 1 also threatens harm to the state’s current population of children. Because Amendment 1 declares that “every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom,” it will grant minors who cannot choose a bank account without parental oversight the right to choose whether their pre-born baby lives or dies without parental consent or even knowledge.

Moreover, by using broad and sweeping language such as “every individual,” “pregnant people,” and “reproductive freedom” Amendment 1 has been positioned to permit the legalization of transgender ideology. Just as the Virginia courts expanded “reproductive freedom” to include IVF procedures without legislative action, the Virginia courts could, on the basis of Amendment 1, expand the term “reproductive freedom” to include sex-change operations and hormone blockers. And if the courts made such a decision, men, women and children of all ages (and without parental consent or even knowledge) would have a constitutional right to transgender health care. In other words, the state could override a parent’s objection to puberty blockers and start giving a fifth-grade girl puberty blockers.  Amendment 1 possesses the potential to harm Virginia’s children and should be opposed.

5069883 Stillborn 2222602 1920

Lastly, this amendment threatens to harm the very women it seeks to empower – those getting an abortion. By increasing access to abortion, the state of Virginia is exposing more women to mental health challenges. Studies have shown that women who murder their children in the womb are 3.4 times more likely than women who give birth to their children to need mental health services. Women who have abortions are more likely to suffer depression and anxiety and to be addicted to drugs or alcohol than women who give birth.

Moreover, Amendment 1 promises that the Commonwealth of Virginia will not “prosecute…any individual for aiding or assisting” in the murder of a baby as long as the mother had given “voluntary assent.” In other words, the pimp who forces a woman to murder her baby so she can return to the streets or the back-alley doctor who performs a shoddy abortion that leaves the mother with lasting physical pain would both be excused from prosecution if the mother signed a consent form…a form that could be easily forged.  Amendment 1 will not empower but harm the women of Virginia and should be opposed.     

Oppose Amendment 2     

The Christians should oppose Amendment 2 because it threatens the well-being of Virginia’s families and churches.

The evangelical church believes that God established marriage between a man and a woman (“male and female he created them – Gen. 1:27”) to express God’s love for his people. Marriage also blesses society with a structure that facilitates the human flourishing of the husband, the wife, and their resulting children. According to a recent study, 39% of women who are married with children reported being very happy while only 24.7% of single women with no children claimed they were very happy. Similarly, 35% of men who are married with children reported being very happy while only 13.8% of single men with no children reported being very happy. And of those married couples, the happiest and most stable marriages were those that affirmed the traditional Catholic or Protestant view of marriage. While 79% of Catholics and 73% of Protestants who affirmed their church’s view of marriage had happy marriages, only 38% of Catholics and 18% of Protestants who disagreed with their church’s teaching on marriage had happy marriages. God’s marriage directives produce human flourishing.  

Moreover, while more than one out of every two heterosexual married couples have children, only slightly more than 3 out of every 10 female same-sex couples have children and only 1 out of every 10 male same-sex couples have children. In short, the biblical or traditional view of marriage offers Virginians the best chance to have children, to have a happy marriage, and to have their best life.

By working against God’s good design, Amendment 2 will push Virginians away from the very path that promises them happiness to the path of gender confusion that has been shown to produce unhappy and anxious adults. Love of neighbor compels Christians to vote no on Amendment 2.    

Wen Zhu AT0q4breKiw Unsplash

Moreover, Amendment 2 makes no allowances for the pastor who rejects the state’s redefinition of marriage. If a pastor refuses to perform a wedding of “two adult persons…on the basis of sex, gender,” he will be in violation of Amendment 2 and subject to the punishment of the state. In other words, Amendment 2 will empower Virginia to tell pastors who they can and cannot marry and then to fine or imprison those pastors who refuse to abide by the law.

Admittedly, the Supreme Court of the United States will most likely override any changes to the Virginia Constitution that run contrary to the U.S. Bill of Rights and will come to the aid of Virginia’s pastors. But the writers of Virginia’s Amendment 2 also understood that the legal process and its corresponding fees will prove more than punishment enough for countless churches in Virginia as Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado discovered. The legal process is punishment. Amendment 2 should be opposed because it threatens the well-being of Virginia’s families and churches.

Vote No

On most issues, Christians should hold their political positions humbly, recognizing that Christian principles can be worked out in a host of diverse ways. For example, Christians can in good faith argue for raising taxes to pay the dogcatcher more or for cutting taxes to pay the dogcatcher less. Neither position is essentially the Christian position.

But when a law – or in Virginia’s case two amendments – violates God’s commands against murder and for marriage, a Christian position does emerge…and should be defended. In other words, Christians should seek the glory of the Lord and the the well-being of their neighbors and vote no on Virginia Amendments 1 & 2 this November.

For the love of neighbor oppose Amendments 1 and 2.

Young Men Don’t Surrender to Madness of Gambling

Young men do not allow the gambling platforms targeting March Madness to drive you into the madness of sports gambling and prediction markets. They promise that their platforms will transform your sports knowledge into the cash needed to live out your fantasies and to provide for your family. They encourage risk which appeals to your impulses to lead while promising you security which appeals to your more rational side. Even if you lose that first bet, many apps will refund your bad decisions with in-app credits. In other words, follow the adrenaline and pursue the cash because you have nothing to lose…well, almost nothing.

The Spiritual Cost

In reality, the apps will cost you your soul. Life is not found in securing quickly gotten fortunes but in obedience to the word of God. Jesus calls young men and all others not to lay up “treasures for yourself on earth…but lay up for yourself treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be (Matt. 6:19-21).” The faithful man pursues not wealth that perishes but holiness, which last for eternity. Those who get this wrong – even if they attain wealth – will lose their contentment, their happiness and their soul. King Solomon warned his sons to be wary of covetousness and greed warning them, “Such are the ways of everyone who is greedy for unjust gain; it takes away the life of its possessors (Prov 1:19).”

No Work Around

Now some young men will seek to squeeze past Jesus’ teachings with appeals to altruism. They gamble not for themselves but for others. They are placing those $500 bets because they want to buy a new home for their wife or to free their parents from the oppressive weight of their student loans. They are not pursuing greed for greed sake but for the sake of loving others.

Though such ideas glimmer with propriety, they still reside outside the bounds of Scripture. To gamble is to earn income apart from work. When the young man receives his gambling payout, he has not produced one of those widgets from economics 101 or any other good or service. He has not created a pizza for his neighbor, produced a report that helps his company adjust their production numbers, or transferred the knowledge of the multiplication tables to his third-grade class. In placing online bets, young men seek gain apart from all those things…apart from the hard work of studying books, twisting bolts, and crunching numbers. Though our society glorifies such ill-gotten gains, the Scriptures warn young men to avoid that which costs them nothing. Proverbs 20:21 proclaims, “An inheritance gained hastily in the beginning will not be blessed in the end.”

Moreover, the mindset of gain that chases wealth apart from work has, either knowingly or unknowingly, embraced a hope that runs counter to the hope of Christ. Those who chase easy money believe that money can heal their heart and wash away their sins. They think their earnings will lead to less stress, which in turn will lead to better test scores or to a better relationship with their young wife. But such hopes will always disappoint for they lead away from the light of Christ. Jesus warns: “If your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness (Matt 6:22).” As Jesus concludes in Matthew 6:24: “You cannot serve God and money.”

Even if you win your millions, you will ultimately lose. The influx of cash will not change, but exacerbate the selfishness that led you to waste m and to fight with your parents or your bride. You will just do so wearing nicer clothes or living in a nicer home.  As Jesus notes in Matthew 16:26: “For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?”

The Financial Cost

And most of you will not gain the whole world. The gambling and prediction market apps can afford to refund that first loss because they know an overwhelming majority of bettors will never ultimately win. According to a study from the University of California only 4% of gamblers earn a net profit.

The other 96% lose their hard-earned money. A U.S. news report found that the majority of gamblers (66%) wager $100 or more a month and that 27% wager $500 dollars or more a month. Those losses often reverberate through the gambler’s life. More than 30% of online gamblers carry debt because of their bets.  A quarter (25%) of them have missed a bill payment because of their bets and a quarter (25%) of them now worry that they have become the slave of the app that was supposed to liberate them from financial troubles. In short, those apps will happily cover the young man’s first loss because they apps know that the odds of that the young man become a lifetime loser are in their favor. This is why those running the apps can afford a suite at the Super Bowl and their clients cannot.

Flee the Apps

Young man, flee from gambling apps and prediction markets that seek to entice your souls. Though the apps promise you the glories of this world, they will not give – but take. What Solomon says of the adulterous woman in Proverbs readily applies to the gambling apps seeking to get space on your phones, “For the lips of a forbidden woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil, but in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword (Prov 5:4).” Young man do not follow the gambling apps to your earthly ruin and to your spiritual death. Close your ears to their cries, do not give them access to your phone, and do give them your hard-earned money. Flee from them.  

Determine now to acquire wealthy justly and honestly through the godly means of hard work. Slowly and faithfully expand your bank account through plumbing buildings, producing reports, and earning degrees and certificates that will lead to more opportunities for more promotion and gain. As Proverbs 13:11 notes: “Wealth gained hastily will dwindle, but whoever gathers little by little will increase it.” Gain wealth little by little.

Godly Adrenaline

Lastly, prove your manliness not through foolish risks shaped by ill-gotten gain but through taking biblical risks shaped around a love of the Lord and others. Endure the teasing of those who mock you for passing on the next adventure so that you can save for your first apartment or home. Embrace the possibility of rejection and pursue and then marry a godly woman. Then, invite the challenges and blessing of children into that marriage. Risk becoming more involved in your church and bearing the burden of your brothers and sisters in Christ. Venture past the limits of social convention and share the gospel with a coworker and lovingly confront a friend over his sin. Take a chance and pursue political office to promote the flourishing of your neighbors. In other words,  chase the adrenaline rush that comes with securing heavenly and avoid those that will fade with the playing of “One Shining Moment.”

Final Thoughts

Young men, the betting apps and prediction markets are calling to you. Guard your life and soul. Do not surrender to the madness of ill-gotten gain which leads to death. Layup for yourself treasures in heaven.  

Would Jesus Protest Cities Church?

The videos of protesters storming into Cities Church in Minneapolis with whistles, curses, and chants of “Ice Out” has raised all kinds of legal questions and one important theological question: would Jesus approve of this church storming?

Scriptural Support?

Seeking to justify the actions of the protesters, several social media theologians and personalities have referenced the time when Jesus’ flipped over tables in the temple. The gospel of Matthew provides the following summary of that event: “And Jesus entered the temple and drove out all who sold and bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold pigeons. (21:12).” These commentators equate the protesters’ belligerence that left children in tears with Jesus’ smashing of pigeon cages.

Were the Protesters Justified?

While Jesus’ actions in the temple were unquestionably disruptive and angered the self-righteous leaders of the temple, thoughtful readers will look beyond the action in an effort to discern their purpose. Jesus did not advocate for disruption for disruption’s sake. He had more non-violent interactions with the temple and other places of worship (shaped by dialogue, Scripture readings, and sermons) than violent.  When Jesus did breakout the whip, he did so not to prevent worship but to prevent others from preventing worship. Jesus offers the following commentary on his actions, “He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you make it a den of robbers (Matt 21:13).” He cleansed the temple because he longed for the temple to proclaim the glory of the Lord so that all the nations might worship him and spirit and truth. Any spiritual practice that runs contrary to the worship of Jesus (even if profitable and sanctioned by someone with reverend before his or her name) was to be purged from places of worship.  

Even if you grant that one cannot be an ICE Agent and a Christian (which I do not – the Scriptures permit men to defend the state – see Lk 3:14), the one thing he would need most would be the worship of this church which transforms people more into God’s image.

In other words, Jesus would not have joined these protesters as they brought and end to true worship for the sake of a political point. Jesus would have support those who shared his vision for spiritual worship and were “teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God (Col 3:16).”

In short, Matthew 21:12-13 condemns the protesters’ harassment of Cities Church. And the passage will also condemn any future protest of a local church that seeks to worship the one true, and triune God in accordance with Jesus’ teaching.

I share the pastor of Cities Church – Jonathan Parnell- assessment of the protest: “This is shameful.”